Consolidated Returns as of 30 November 2024
Managing the The Lazy Team Dynamic 60/40 Income Portfolio with a yearly rebalancing, you would have obtained a 8.14% compound annual return in the last 30 Years.
With a quarterly rebalancing, over the same period, the return would have been 7.50%.
How do returns and drawdowns change, implementing different rebalancing strategies?
Rebalancing Strategies
In order to keep risk under control, you should rebalance assets quotes from time to time, so to keep them at the original percentage of the asset allocation.
At fixed time intervals:
- Yearly: Jan 1st
- Half Yearly: Jan 1st, Jul 1st
- Quarterly: Jan 1st, Apr 1st, Jul 1st, Oct 1st
Portfolio Returns as of Nov 30, 2024
Implementing different rebalancing strategies, the The Lazy Team Dynamic 60/40 Income Portfolio guaranteed the following returns.
Portfolio returns are calculated in USD, assuming:
- No fees or capital gain taxes
- the reinvestment of dividends, if existing
| Return (%) and number of rebalances as of Nov 30, 2024 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebalancing Strategy | 1Y | 5Y | 10Y | 30Y |
MAX (~33Y) |
|||||
| No Rebalancing | 24.63 | (0) | 7.80 | (0) | 7.32 | (0) | 8.14 | (0) | 8.07 | (0) |
| Yearly Rebalancing | 18.13 | (1) | 5.86 | (5) | 5.79 | (10) | 7.59 | (30) | 7.58 | (33) |
| Half Yearly Rebalancing | 18.11 | (2) | 5.77 | (10) | 5.74 | (20) | 7.50 | (60) | 7.50 | (66) |
| Quarterly Rebalancing | 18.16 | (4) | 5.85 | (20) | 5.79 | (40) | 7.64 | (120) | 7.63 | (132) |
| 5% Tolerance per asset | 18.19 | (0) | 5.82 | (1) | 5.87 | (3) | 7.74 | (13) | 7.71 | (13) |
| 10% Tolerance per asset | 19.89 | (0) | 6.06 | (0) | 6.10 | (1) | 8.04 | (5) | 7.98 | (5) |
In order to have complete information about the portfolio, please refer to the The Lazy Team Dynamic 60/40 Income Portfolio: ETF allocation and returns page.
Performances as of Nov 30, 2024
Historical returns and stats of The Lazy Team Dynamic 60/40 Income Portfolio, after implementing different rebalancing strategies.
|
Standard Deviation
|
Max Drawdown (%)
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebalancing Strategy | Return % | Std Dev(%) | Ret. / Std Dev | MaxDD(%) | Ret. / MaxDD | |
| No Rebalancing | 8.07 | (0) | 10.98 | 0.73 | -47.86 | 0.17 |
| Yearly Rebalancing | 7.58 | (33) | 9.08 | 0.83 | -41.44 | 0.18 |
| Half Yearly Rebalancing | 7.50 | (66) | 9.10 | 0.82 | -41.83 | 0.18 |
| Quarterly Rebalancing | 7.63 | (132) | 9.13 | 0.84 | -40.97 | 0.19 |
| 5% Tolerance per asset | 7.71 | (13) | 9.18 | 0.84 | -40.56 | 0.19 |
| 10% Tolerance per asset | 7.98 | (5) | 9.58 | 0.83 | -42.04 | 0.19 |
Drawdowns as of Nov 30, 2024
Historical Drawdowns of The Lazy Team Dynamic 60/40 Income Portfolio, after implementing different rebalancing strategies.
|
Rebalancing
|
Tolerance per asset
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Rebalancing | Yearly | Half Yearly | Quarterly | 5% | 10% |
|
-47.86
Jun 2007 - Feb 2011
|
-41.44
Jun 2007 - Sep 2010
|
-41.83
Jun 2007 - Sep 2010
|
-40.97
Jun 2007 - Apr 2010
|
-40.56
Jun 2007 - Apr 2010
|
-42.04
Jun 2007 - Apr 2010
|
|
-23.22
Jan 2022 - Jul 2024
|
-18.21
Jan 2022 - Jul 2024
|
-18.35
Jan 2022 - Jul 2024
|
-18.41
Jan 2022 - Jul 2024
|
-18.46
Jan 2022 - Jul 2024
|
-19.63
Jan 2022 - Jul 2024
|
|
-18.80
Feb 2020 - Nov 2020
|
-14.24
Feb 2020 - Nov 2020
|
-14.24
Feb 2020 - Nov 2020
|
-14.24
Feb 2020 - Aug 2020
|
-14.78
Feb 2020 - Nov 2020
|
-14.63
Feb 2020 - Nov 2020
|
|
-12.07
Jun 2011 - Jan 2012
|
-10.41
Jun 2011 - Jan 2012
|
-10.27
Jun 2011 - Jan 2012
|
-10.24
Jun 2011 - Jan 2012
|
-10.85
Jun 2011 - Jan 2012
|
-11.83
Jun 2011 - Jan 2012
|
|
-8.89
Sep 2018 - Mar 2019
|
-7.02
Jul 1998 - Dec 1998
|
-6.93
Jul 1998 - Jan 1999
|
-6.93
Jul 1998 - Dec 1998
|
-7.41
Jul 1998 - Dec 1998
|
-8.27
Jul 1998 - Dec 1998
|
| 5 Worst Drawdowns - Average | |||||
| -22.17 | -18.26 | -18.33 | -18.16 | -18.41 | -19.28 |
| 10 Worst Drawdowns - Average | |||||
| -14.54 | -11.98 | -12.00 | -12.05 | -12.26 | -12.78 |
For a deeper insight, please refer to the The Lazy Team Dynamic 60/40 Income Portfolio: ETF allocation and returns page.
